> “cancel culture” (a concept I vehemently disagree with, since what is referred to as “cancellation” is often just “facing consequences”). In a post decrying

> “cancel culture” (a concept I vehemently disagree with, since what is referred to as “cancellation” is often just “facing consequences”). In a post decrying the consequences of his actions, the author condemns those who criticise the same. Cancel culture is specifically about “cancelling” people over completely asinine comments regardless of whether anyone was actually offended. I don’t understand why the author defends the principals by which he was abused. You’d think he’d see some fundamental flaw in there.