The organization's Code of Conduct was so broad-reaching, thorough, and explicit that it doesn't appear to have left any leeway for common sense. Did we read t

The organization's Code of Conduct was so broad-reaching, thorough, and explicit that it doesn't appear to have left any leeway for common sense. Did we read the same article? The article says that he was pointed at two contradictory codes of conduct, and violated for violating unstated standards from an implicit code of conduct that wasn't revealed to him. That's making shit up to be able to say you did something. It is exactly the opposite of rigidly following a code of conduct. And, as the article points out, they managed to fail to follow their own official code of conduct in the process.