3 ms·
CA used deceptive practices to collect user data, & downloaded personally identifiable information for u users and their friends without notification or consent
by cleansingfire 6y ago
CA used deceptive practices to collect user data, & downloaded personally identifiable information for u users and their friends without notification or consent, unlike NYU. Those are significant differences.
- sfashset 6y agoCA didn't do any of those things. They purchased some data an academic had collected from a FB quiz app. There's absolutely nothing stopping one of the NYU academics from selling the data they collect for their study to "Cambridge Analytica 2.0" in 12 months. If that happens, which FB would not be able to stop, this situation become identical to the CA scenario. There would be no significant differences.
- freeopinion 6y agoI think it is significant that one happened server-side using FB tooling and the other happens client-side without FB being complicit. One was explicitly installed by the user, the other was foisted upon the unwitting user. So, maybe some significant differences, depending on your POV.
- tqi 6y agoBut AFAIK both CA and NYU got "consent" to access data from the users who installed their game/extension, but neither are asking consent from users' friends (ie the crux of the CA scandal).