3 ms·

Yeah but then you have to use XSLT. (Jokes aside, I tried this years ago hoping for it to be a magic bullet. Gzipping meant that the bandwidth savings weren’t

by untog 6y ago

Yeah but then you have to use XSLT. (Jokes aside, I tried this years ago hoping for it to be a magic bullet. Gzipping meant that the bandwidth savings weren’t anywhere near what I hoped and XSLT is a PITA to deal with)

baybal2 6y ago
Tons of 10+ years old bugs in Chrome, yes, full of hacks, but it's doable.
mst 6y ago
I'm not sure if it's still a going concern but I found SXSLT made XSLT much less annoying to deal with. It's a natural fit for S-exprs.