3 ms·
I'm not surprised: one of Wayland's goal is to produce 'perfect frame' at the very least this has a latency cost..
by renox 6y ago
I'm not surprised: one of Wayland's goal is to produce 'perfect frame' at the very least this has a latency cost..
- The_rationalist 6y agoI have yet to see evidence that Wayland has less artifacts/tearing than X. Wayland does not has such a thing: https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Radeon-TearFree-Rotate https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=Radeon-T... Also Wayland probably has less support for adaptative sync (which is the biggest feature regarding what you call a perfect frame)
- dralley 6y agoTry watching videos in VLC media player on Xorg vs Wayland, you'll see the difference. The former is nearly unwatchable if the scene has lots of darkness punctuated by light, such as a fire.
- account42 6y agoX11 doesn't have tearing for me.
- majewsky 6y ago> less support for adaptive sync What does "less support" mean? At least on my system, Sway is running with adaptive sync enabled.
- The_rationalist 6y agoSway is the only Wayland compositor to supports freesync