Yes, it's a monopoly. No one is forced to use electricity but people don't really have much of a choice when it comes to power providers. If you want to build a

Yes, it's a monopoly. No one is forced to use electricity but people don't really have much of a choice when it comes to power providers. If you want to build an audience by micro blogging there is no other platform that comes close to Twitter's reach. They have almost the entire market. Section 230 protects Twitter a great deal, in a way that neither Fox nor CNN nor any other news organization gets. When those organizations publish false information they can be sued. Twitter cannot thanks to 230. That's a huge advantage. And their meddling in free speech violates the impetus for the 230 legislation in the first place. If they are going to meddle, they don't deserve protection from liability. If it's useless legislation in your opinion, let's just get rid of it and see what the lawyers do with Twitter. Is that fair, in your mind? It's fair in mine.