3 ms·
230 is a law, not part of the constitution. It could be rewritten, for example, to say that if you want to claim protections under 230, you need to be clear abo
by insickness 6y ago
230 is a law, not part of the constitution. It could be rewritten, for example, to say that if you want to claim protections under 230, you need to be clear about what your rules are and those rules must be evenly enforced.
As it stands, big tech is hiding behind enforcement of their rules, but we don't know what the rules are and seemingly everyone has broken them. But they get to decide when those rules are enforced.