The paper I presented is not theory in the scientific sense. It's theory in the mathematical/logic proof based sense. There are really two uses of the word "the

The paper I presented is not theory in the scientific sense. It's theory in the mathematical/logic proof based sense. There are really two uses of the word "theory" for this context, science based theories proven by statistical experiments, and logical based theories created from a set of elements and assumed axioms. Things like this shouldn't be titled with "Theory." Call it your "opinion" or a "design pattern." Theory is associated with things like the theory of gravity (science) or game theory (math). This title is wildly inappropriate and shows a lack of understanding of what constitutes a theory. The fact that this post is voted up shows how much the public misunderstands "theory" and how they mistake things like this which is actually just someone's qualitative opinion with the integrity of an actual theory. Using big words and drawing diagrams does not lend any formal legitimacy to your opinion.