3 ms·
100% this. 4 to 6 seconds for effectively static content is absolutely insane, and only justifiable for exceptionally rarely accessed dynamic data queries. It
by falcolas 6y ago
100% this.
4 to 6 seconds for effectively static content is absolutely insane, and only justifiable for exceptionally rarely accessed dynamic data queries.
It shouldn't matter how "common" this response time is, when you can load a huge static HTML/CSS/PNG site in hundreds of milliseconds.