2 ms·
It's atrociously slow. It makes no sense at all for a blog post.
by enriquto 6y ago
It's atrociously slow. It makes no sense at all for a blog post.
- falcolas 6y ago100% this. 4 to 6 seconds for effectively static content is absolutely insane, and only justifiable for exceptionally rarely accessed dynamic data queries. It shouldn't matter how "common" this response time is, when you can load a huge static HTML/CSS/PNG site in hundreds of milliseconds.