4 ms·
It should still be BY-SA. Ancillary and auxiliary sources are key to scientific criticism.
by anticensor 6y ago
It should still be BY-SA. Ancillary and auxiliary sources are key to scientific criticism.
- oh_sigh 6y agoWhat form of criticisms are possible with BY-SA that aren't with BY-CC? Criticism would usually come in the form of new papers which merely reference the previous one.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- anticensor 6y agoDirect editing of offending paper while adding you to authors. (that derivative work should still be referenced to the same DOI et al.)