3 ms·
Well, your comment was: > The German subsidiaries of those companies, in Germany run by German citizens, still traded in Germany yes. That sounds a bit simpli
by leipert 6y ago
Well, your comment was:
> The German subsidiaries of those companies, in Germany run by German citizens, still traded in Germany yes.
That sounds a bit simplistic, of course if the German government ceases their operation and severs ties to the US, there is not much to be done, on the other hand e.g. Ford employed slave labor even _before_ ties to the US company were cut [0].
While Nazi Germany is ultimately responsible for these atrocities; in my opinion: companies still have / should have a moral duty. Some companies are exploring their past, e.g. Coffee companies with their ties to human trafficking. I think we need more of that, even just acknowledging our past, because "with power comes great responsibility" and those large companies, more powerful as some smaller countries should be held accountable and should do everything to prevent abuse and exploitation.
You seem to focus on the economics only, I agree profit might not have been the right term, but if a company actively exploited people it shouldn't matter too much whether they turned a profit.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Germany#Use_of_forced_labor_during_World_War_II https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_Germany#Use_of_forced_lab...
- simonh 6y agoI agree completely, but it is the people doing the exploiting that are responsible. Lots of people have benefited from all sorts of crimes through no fault of their own, nor any way to know what was happening or even any way to stop it even if they had. History is full of examples. You and I are probably included.