Right, if we forbid one technology that's dangerous, we must also forbid any technology that could in any way be used in a negative manner, right? Cars can be

Right, if we forbid one technology that's dangerous, we must also forbid any technology that could in any way be used in a negative manner, right? Cars can be used to run people over, better forbid those. A hammer can cave someone's head in, better forbid that. People can drown in water, better forbid that too. After all, we wouldn't want to be inconsistent. It's not like we would ever consider using any kind of judgement and conclude that the benefits outweigh the risks for some things. That's just silly.