3 ms·
> If I could extend my life by 50 years of good health I might take that offer. If I had to extend it by 500 years, I'm pretty sure I'd decline. If I had to ext
by sigstoat 6y ago
> If I could extend my life by 50 years of good health I might take that offer. If I had to extend it by 500 years, I'm pretty sure I'd decline. If I had to extend it 5000 years I'd certainly say no. 5M years of existence would be torture.
is this a thing you worry might happen? like, if life extension is developed, you're concerned it will come in the form of a 5 million year increment, take it or leave it, no possibility of suicide in the middle?
> When people express the desire to live forever, either here on earth or in an imagined afterlife, I wonder if they have really thought through the consequences.
i wonder why you interpret the desire to live forever as some enforced, not only eternal, but literally unendable existence.
i expect we'll manage to simply end aging first. that won't prevent you from walking out into rural alaska in your underwear.
- LASR 6y ago5M years? Well it entirely depends on how you get to spend those years. As technology advances, I am sure we would also solve the problem of not knowing how to spend 5M years and still go on.
- tasty_freeze 6y agoThe Christian idea of an afterlife that I was raised with and apparently most people in the US follow is an eternal afterlife and there is no opting out of it once you get there. As for the hypothetical, no, I don't worry about for a microsecond because it won't become reality anytime soon.