3 ms·
Or a 6th option: Over 80% of people have Vitamin D deficiency, and the incoming Covid-19 patient population was not different in this regard.
by tgdual 6y ago
Or a 6th option: Over 80% of people have Vitamin D deficiency, and the incoming Covid-19 patient population was not different in this regard.
- Johnny555 6y agoI don't know of any post-COVID studies, but most studies pre-COVID show around 40% of the population being deficient both in the USA and Europe.
- cbanek 6y agoThis, and as someone who recently found out that they have a severe vitamin D deficiency, I was surprised to know that it's not something normally checked for in yearly blood tests.
- lucas_membrane 6y agoCheck the videos on Dr John Campbell's (PhD nurse educator in the UK) web site. The UK national health service has good medical records that can be cross-referenced and cross-linked every which way. Someone examined the historical records, found a reasonably large number of persons who had vitamin D levels checked before the pandemic, and checked those statistics vs the Covid-19 experience of the same people. (Imagine living in a country where that could happen.) IIRC, this did find some benefits wrt COVID-19 of not having a very low vitamin D level.
- drited 6y agoThis isn't really a 7th option because it overlaps with some of the previously mentioned ones, but perhaps individuals who don't supplement with vitamin D are more likely to catch Covid-19 because they also don't take other precautions like wearing masks. Anecdotally it seems those I know who are most concerned about Covid-19 know all about the possible link with vitamin D and are taking supplements while also being careful by wearing masks, sanitising etc.
- J-dawg 6y agoRecently I keep seeing references to protecting oneself by wearing a mask. When did the narrative shift from "wear a mask to limit transmission to others in case you might be infected and asymptomatic" to "wear a mask to protect yourself"? Assuming we are talking about the usual surgical / cloth masks here (not N95 etc), is there any evidence that they protect the wearer? We all know that mask wearing and the science (or lack of it) to support it has become ridiculously politicised, but I'm curious if there's any evidence behind this particular shift.
- wasmitnetzen 6y agoThere is some weak evidence that wearing a cloth mask might protect yourself: https://www.businessinsider.com/56-got-coronavirus-south-korea-starbucks-mask-wearers-did-not-2020-8?op=1&r=US&IR=T https://www.businessinsider.com/56-got-coronavirus-south-kor... https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/06/21/880832213/yes-wearing-masks-helps-heres-why?t=1603879635977 https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2020/06/21/8808322...
- bipson 6y agoThere were results from studies showing weak effects of self-protection even by "simple" surgical masks a few months ago. Evidence seems to indicate there is such an effect - and contradicting the initial assumption that there isn't.
- PeterStuer 6y agoThat would be incorrect. Even though the causal vector is unknown, the correlation is well established.