4 ms·
This was wrong.
by soganess 6y ago
This was wrong.
- scythe 6y ago>I'm sure there is a very good reason for this 50 year old, really high impact, supposedly peer reviewed, journal of medicine to have a single line Wikipedia page. Is this a serious comment? Take a look at their editorial board: https://academic.oup.com/jcem/pages/editorial_board https://academic.oup.com/jcem/pages/editorial_board
- soganess 6y agoUgh, I'm a complete idiot. I always just run sources that I don't really know that much about through the first pass filter of who is the publisher of the article and how are they related to the journal and the authors. Then do a Wikipedia search to see if they at least have visibility there. This failed the sniff test in my book, but clearly I was wrong.