It sounds like you've found good reason to be skeptical about popularized anti-male research. But I'm confused by how strong of a statement you're making about

It sounds like you've found good reason to be skeptical about popularized anti-male research. But I'm confused by how strong of a statement you're making about climate change: > ..., it may be possible that climate change is real, it is just that we have no proof of it, except by people who also claim the feminist science is true." Wouldn't you need to really dig into original sources to conclude that no such evidence exists?