> Its a very old and as far as I was aware its no longer maintained and not recommended for securing things. This doesn't mean it has a "fundamental flaw that

> Its a very old and as far as I was aware its no longer maintained and not recommended for securing things. This doesn't mean it has a "fundamental flaw that means everything it encrypted is trivial to unlock today." There has been no evidence to suggest that is true. An NCC Group audit found no significant flaws: https://opencryptoaudit.org/reports/TrueCrypt_Phase_II_NCC_OCAP_final.pdf https://opencryptoaudit.org/reports/TrueCrypt_Phase_II_NCC_O...