The people that were "disciplined" were the offenders, not the people reporting the offense. Nevermind what I said. That said, I agree, they should definitely n

The people that were "disciplined" were the offenders, not the people reporting the offense. Nevermind what I said. That said, I agree, they should definitely not be working for that company anymore (at least). It doesn't matter if you're firing your golden goose. This shows the level of respect this company has for the people it's surveilling, though, if even their own employees, when under surveillance, experience this level of disrespect. THIS PART IS WRONG, IT'S THE ORIGINAL POST AND I LEFT IT FOR POSTERITY: If in the US, wouldn't this be illegal? Retaliation against employees tends to go poorly for the retaliators.