2 ms·
This article seems a bit simplistic. It really depends on whether your current and near-future tax rate is less than your tax rate in retirement. Consider that
by abstractbarista 6y ago
This article seems a bit simplistic. It really depends on whether your current and near-future tax rate is less than your tax rate in retirement. Consider that politically, taxes may be lower now than they will be in 30 years. Your tax rate typically increases as you progress in an industry.
In my case, I max out a 401k that is split 2/3 Roth, 1/3 Traditional. I also max out a Roth IRA every year. Additionally, I'm stuffing all excess cash in a taxable brokerage account. The taxable account is growing faster than the Roth IRA because I'm limiting discretionary spending and buying equities whenever I have extra cash.
I expect my tax rate to be higher in retirement since I'm saving like crazy as a 25 year old (and have been for years already) and expect to continue to do so for decades.
(I wouldn't even be surprised if some politicians decide to bludgeon me for being a responsible saver by voiding the tax-free withdrawals of Roths in the future. But that's a bit paranoid and hopefully won't happen.)
- oxfeed65261 6y agoAs a person of more modest means, I hope that it will happen. Hoarding your own money is not, in any meaningful sense, “responsible.”
- floor2 6y agoI really wish people would stop using ridiculous hyperbole like "hoarding" when describing "a middle-class person saving for a future emergency or retirement". For starters, in the modern economy, the notion of "hoarding" is mostly antiquated - people aren't storing their wealth by keeping a silo full of grain (which might overall benefit society by being distributed to the hungry now) but instead by owning shares of the business that provide the goods, services and employment that keep society working and allow everyone to live a modern life instead of being hunter-gatherers. The worker who is maxing out their 401k is not your enemy.