3 ms·
That's a funny stance given the context in which the material was introduced: as evidence that powerful people are racist "by their own admission". Doesn't soun
by Chris2048 6y ago
That's a funny stance given the context in which the material was introduced: as evidence that powerful people are racist "by their own admission". Doesn't sound like the no-big-deal definition of racism they might have thought they were confessing to.
It also suggests it's up to session-organisers to decide what justifiably humiliates a person.
- shadowgovt 6y agoHumiliation is in the eye of the beholder. I don't see them as humiliated. They don't appear to think they are humiliated. Perhaps it's just not humiliating.
- Chris2048 6y ago> They don't appear to think they are humiliated How do you know? It doesn't sound like the kind of session where honest (dissenting) exchange is encouraged.
- shadowgovt 6y agoWe don't have a lot of signal on what kind of session it is. It's not the conclusion I'd jump to from one Free Beacon screenshot.
- Chris2048 6y agoDo you think multiple people would naturally volunteer to say those things in a regular session?
- shadowgovt 6y agoI don't have nearly enough insight into the inner workings of the minds of Northwestern University Law School administrators to guess.