We use the logo in the wapm website [1]. Using a non-accessible logo that is hard to read provides a non-ideal experience for our visitors, so we can't really

We use the logo in the wapm website [1]. Using a non-accessible logo that is hard to read provides a non-ideal experience for our visitors, so we can't really use it unless it becomes more polished. This forced wapm to use a different WASI logo than the "official" one, which is also a non-ideal experience (it adds fragmentation). That's why we believe is just better to push all along a bit more polished logo. Is such a simple thing to fix, that I'm surprised of the amount of flamewar that it generated. [1] https://wapm.io/interface/wasi https://wapm.io/interface/wasi