> You believe the senate is constitutionally compelled to give advice on supreme court nominations? So 4 years ago they "weren't constitutionally compelled to

> You believe the senate is constitutionally compelled to give advice on supreme court nominations? So 4 years ago they "weren't constitutionally compelled to give advice", whereas now they're following the Constitution's "clear direction on the structure of government"? Same situation, different outcomes, and funny how both satisfy the demands of the Constitution. I guess it must be one of those documents where you can do whatever you want and say it's what the Constitution says.