> I assume anything that requires extra developer hours Not sure why I was downvoted but this was my question, though I should've framed it nicer. I'm curious

> I assume anything that requires extra developer hours Not sure why I was downvoted but this was my question, though I should've framed it nicer. I'm curious why there aren't more designers (even understudies) contributing to OSS, even to build their portfolio, in a similar way SWEs do. > That being said, this '4 decades dated to 1 decade dated' is not an useful way to criticize a design. Great design is atemporal. I'm no designer but this seems absurd to me. Judging designs temporally seems to be commonplace. The new site feels like a period of design ruled by Bootstrap which new designs are using less than ever. I also agree it's not in good taste to be critiquing of open source and reduced funding projects but I'm curious about the talent-attraction mechanics. We should be able to talk about that. With that said, kudos to them for getting it out! Heres to hoping more designers dive into OSS :)