3 ms·

> this is a strawman argument. I'm reading this as a header declaration. You are arguing a range of items without actually touching on my point - that health

> this is a strawman argument. I'm reading this as a header declaration. You are arguing a range of items without actually touching on my point - that health data patterns require a link from encounter and observations back to a patient record. I think that you are arguing a number of these points with incomplete information (i.e. that you have little understanding of the pressures which result in the continued existence of Windows XP within the health ecosystem), and on other points you are completely missing the point (storing patient data on the cloud is a whole different argument). > Data is money today , so industry is not interested in better safety of medical data either, preventing aggregate collection will loose a lot of value for med tech companies. The data has relatively minimal value for the makers of patient record systems. The value of these systems are in the licensing and ancillary/secondary services.

manquer 6y ago
I agree my understanding is limited into your industry. I don't need to have an understanding, I am just a regular Joe who's data security your industry does not give a thought about and his data leaked constantly[1]. After so many leaks, I do not see an acknowledgement of systemic issues. I see no discourse on how the industry can step up and improve their security practices. I see no significant update to regulation in response to any of this. If your industry cannot move fast enough with the consumer tech industry then you should not be basing your tech stack on a OS like XP in the first place , XP always was going to have limited window of mainline support. Core banking is perfectly happy using COBOL and zOS for the last 50 years. [2] If you don't believe the architectural choices the industry makes and attitude towards tech has anything to do with the data security problems there is nothing I can say to convince you. [1] I am focusing on one thing only security not privacy or anything else, i.e. unintentionally sharing data. [2] it is not that fin tech is without its problems either, however in general fin tech has responded to security concerns.

manquer 6y ago

I agree my understanding is limited into your industry. I don't need to have an understanding, I am just a regular Joe who's data security your industry does not give a thought about and his data leaked constantly[1]. After so many leaks, I do not see an acknowledgement of systemic issues. I see no discourse on how the industry can step up and improve their security practices. I see no significant update to regulation in response to any of this. If your industry cannot move fast enough with the consumer tech industry then you should not be basing your tech stack on a OS like XP in the first place , XP always was going to have limited window of mainline support. Core banking is perfectly happy using COBOL and zOS for the last 50 years. [2] If you don't believe the architectural choices the industry makes and attitude towards tech has anything to do with the data security problems there is nothing I can say to convince you. [1] I am focusing on one thing only security not privacy or anything else, i.e. unintentionally sharing data. [2] it is not that fin tech is without its problems either, however in general fin tech has responded to security concerns.