3 ms·
> suppress them ... by force The trouble is deciding who gets to wield that force
by chromatin 6y ago
> suppress them ... by force
The trouble is deciding who gets to wield that force
- fergbrain 6y agoBy definition it’s the state (whomever the state allows), since they have a monopoly on force.
- robotresearcher 6y agoWhich means as ever it's super important to maintain and preferably improve democratic processes to keep the state accountable for that terrible responsibility. Also, vote!
- mulmen 6y agoThe "who" is pretty easy, it's the state. Who they wield it on and to what extent is the open question.
- jdoliner 6y agoThe first question in any political movement is always the same: Who, whom? I.e. who's wielding power and over whom are they wielding it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who,_whom%3F https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Who,_whom%3F
- hartator 6y ago> The trouble is deciding who gets to wield that force Whoever is wielding the force is the one gets to wield it. We can have a more civilized society by strictly limiting the wield the force by limiting opportunity to weild it by clear defined individual rights.