4 ms·
Because the RIAA has shown that this specific tool can't be 'public'. If we have to play by those rules, LEO should too. Boo hoo if it's harder.
by cheeze 6y ago
Because the RIAA has shown that this specific tool can't be 'public'.
If we have to play by those rules, LEO should too. Boo hoo if it's harder.
- bonoboTP 6y ago> RIAA has shown They haven't shown anything. They made a claim. We'll know what rules we have to play by if it comes to a court ruling.
- cheeze 6y agoI mean, GitHub took it down, no?
- ekianjo 6y agoThey follow the DMCA process.
- inqb 6y agoYou can claim anything, too. GitHub only checks if the Takedown is valid in format with necessary information provided.
- bonoboTP 6y agoHas someone abused this to harass big-name Github projects with takedown notices?
- feanaro 6y agoWhy would that have any bearing on the validity and legality of RIAA's logic?
- efreak 6y agoThe RIAA isn't part of the government.
- feanaro 6y agoWhat if this tool remains public in a different part of the world? Are you going to wall off from the rest of the world so you can no longer see the tool and pretend it doesn't exist?