4 ms·
Wow, that is just classic lying with statistics. 1. You cannot just rely on how many sick people happen to be tested. Every single serology study implies a IFR
by turing_complete 6y ago
Wow, that is just classic lying with statistics.
1. You cannot just rely on how many sick people happen to be tested. Every single serology study implies a IFR of well under one percent. I am willing to bet that it will end up between 0.1 and 0.6 % for any developed country.
2. You cherrypick your data if you compare Sweden with Denmark or Germany and not with France or the UK.
My hypothesis is that countries that protect the elderly, and especially nursing homes, well have much fewer deaths. In every country this is were the deaths are concentrated.