> You are describing the abridging private organizations' right to free speech by congress... There is a large amount of legal precedent in the US for the gove

> You are describing the abridging private organizations' right to free speech by congress... There is a large amount of legal precedent in the US for the government being able to compel speech of private businesses, both in laws and court rulings. If you don't believe me, go look at your nearest "nutrition facts" label. But we have precedents that go much deeper than that, up to and including compelled speech that goes against the religious principles of a business's founders. There is no realistic argument for the government being unable to compel a private company like Twitter to cease censoring posts on political grounds.