It's a bit of a catch-22 for twitter. If the material is fake and proven to be false, then I don't think it can meet their definition of "hacked" content (unles

It's a bit of a catch-22 for twitter. If the material is fake and proven to be false, then I don't think it can meet their definition of "hacked" content (unless some fake stuff is mixed in with real hacked data to make it appear more authentic). Even if it's real, it's a bit debatable whether or not it meets their definition of hacked content, especially since the rule has been ignored in the past (I suppose for tweets that were deemed in the public interest?) (More caveats- I'm assuming you're talking about Hunter Biden although he isnt a presidential candidate and AFAIK the post's article hasn't been proven false, although it's certainly worth being skeptical about. Especially given the sketchiness of the source)