4 ms·
Stoped reading after the author made an equivalent comparison between NYT and Brietbart...I mean, you're not fooling anyone with the "un-biased, unaffiliated vo
by repo001 6y ago
Stoped reading after the author made an equivalent comparison between NYT and Brietbart...I mean, you're not fooling anyone with the "un-biased, unaffiliated voter just searching for the truth" shtick. It's 2020 buddy, we see what you're doing.
- dsaavy 6y agoOP here, the statement mentioning Breitbart alongside the NYT isn't meant to make them equivalent. It's meant to point out that I follow media outlets with major influence for their respective audience. Breitbart is unfortunately a favorite for Republican audiences alongside Fox News, which is why they're mentioned. It's important to track media outlets that have large influence over Democrat and Republican audiences to be aware of what the parties will use as "evidence" to their position and the downfall of those sources.
- zonzobonzo 6y agotrue brietbart and fox are influential over their readers, bu t they cannot be compared to responsible publishers in respect to their commitment to the truth, and therefore do not deserve respect of those of us who are committed to the truth.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- bodono 6y agoThank goodness you didn't step out of your filter bubble. A close one!
- newcomputer 6y agoOut of curiosity, which do you think is less credible? Both primarily write stories that advance the political interests of their respective parties and both rarely verify the accuracy of information that supports their party. The only real difference between them is that Breitbart writes all their headlines in all-caps and NYT uses the less obnoxious sentence case.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]