3 ms·
A lot of comments seem to be picky with the photo of the lady in the parka. As I mentioned in another comment, I read the article itself and that photo in parti
by spike021 6y ago
A lot of comments seem to be picky with the photo of the lady in the parka. As I mentioned in another comment, I read the article itself and that photo in particular was a hand-held 3-second long exposure in near-complete darkness. It was a test of the Night Mode for portraits.
It was literally just to see how the new LIDAR stuff can help with a nearly impossibly dark shot.
Of course a DSLR/mirrorless with proper lighting and a tripod would actually look good.
I don't think that was the point with that test shot, though.
- whoisburbansky 6y agoAgreed; the apples-to-(heh)-apples comparison would be that photo against a hand-held DSLR 3-second exposure, or a shorter exposure with the ISO maxed out, and even them I'm fairly certain the DSLR image would be barely usable.
- sudosysgen 6y agoA handheld MILC with a stabilized f/1.2 or f/1.4 lens at a 0.5sx3 stacked exposure would be the proper comparison, and it would be more than usable. Modern cameras can take video with nothing but moonlight, let alone photography.
- fomine3 6y agoWorth to check A7S3