> On what grounds do you think it would constitute fair use? It meets at least 2 of the fair use factors: 1) the purpose and character of the use, including w

> On what grounds do you think it would constitute fair use? It meets at least 2 of the fair use factors: 1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; 2) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; > Fair use isn't some magic pixie dust that lets you do whatever you want with someone else's copyrighted material. I didn't claim it was? I said this specific use seems to be a fairly good example. See above factors. > Fair use is a defense you can raise in court, _after_ you have been sued. It is not a presumptive right. Not correct. This has been challenged in court and it was found that fair use is a right and not simply a defense.