5 ms·
Yes, I think many people commenting here have jumped to react to the headline with their own political views, not the article. Perhaps the title should reflect
by dashundchen 6y ago
Yes, I think many people commenting here have jumped to react to the headline with their own political views, not the article. Perhaps the title should reflect it's over money laundering, not content of Epik's clients.
Anyone who has read stories of or dealt with Paypal before knows they will cut off access if they even have an inkling of illegal activity happening. Their relationship with the banks and payment processors depends on it. So it's no surprise Epik advertising tax evasion using Paypal would get them terminated.
Epik doesn't really help their case with the response letter, it's written in a unhinged fashion without any substantiation of their claims of censorship by "Paypal executives".
- cft 6y agoThat's called selective enforcement
- lykr0n 6y agoIt totally is. They're selectively enforcing their policy against people large enough to catch the attention of PayPal's Compliance Teams. Automated actions are taken against small accounts, Manual Enforcement will happen against large accounts.