>These diversity training people do use a different definition of racism then what you are thinking of. Sure, but this only reinforces u/rayiner's point. Nobo

>These diversity training people do use a different definition of racism then what you are thinking of. Sure, but this only reinforces u/rayiner's point. Nobody amended or replaced the Civil Rights Act. No vote was held to enshrine a broader definition of racism as legally and ethically binding on all citizens. Instead, a small clique of well-connected professional-class people are imposing this stuff top-down through their control of ostensibly private (but in fact, pseudo-private, often dependent on donations, subsidies, tax breaks, or public funding) institutions. To my mind, the solution is simple: bring major public institutions back under full public governance and control. No more "we're on private property" rubbish from people taking tax dollars. And, preferably, a fresh labor law enshrining protection for political opinions in the workplace that do not violate extent civil-rights laws.