> the presumption is that the patient’s recollection is the accurate one, given that this is an unusual situation for the patient to be in, but a routine situat

> the presumption is that the patient’s recollection is the accurate one, given that this is an unusual situation for the patient to be in, but a routine situation for the doctor. That doesn't make sense to me. The patient is in a shocking situation and intoxicated. More important is that the doctor wasn't even present for the medication so has no evidence at all. Damages are decided by jury's emotions.