3 ms·
> The big problem with nuclear propulsion is always: What happens if a rocket with such an engine explodes at the start? The big problem is that most people do
by mabbo 6y ago
> The big problem with nuclear propulsion is always: What happens if a rocket with such an engine explodes at the start?
The big problem is that most people don't realize that isn't a problem at all.
We've been launching radiation-powered devices into space for decades in the form of RPS's, Radioisotope-powered systems. In one launch, the rocket exploded and even then the radioactive parts were unharmed[0]
And 'accidentally reenters the atmosphere' isn't really a thing. Once an object is in orbit above a certain height, it takes a lot of energy to get it out of orbit. The only alternative is waiting for the very faint amount of atmosphere to drag on it and bring it down- and anything about 1000km, that would be decades of waiting.
We launch the radioactive components safely, as we have lots of experience doing. We then assemble the nuclear engine in-orbit at an orbit above 1000km. Then we go to Mars!
[0]https://rps.nasa.gov/about-rps/safety-and-reliability/ https://rps.nasa.gov/about-rps/safety-and-reliability/
- InfiniteRand 6y agoWould there be any way to do a test flight of this technology without the in-orbit infrastructure? Maybe we should just blow up a nuclear bomb in space just to make sure there isn’t any weird interaction of physical forces we didn’t anticipate for an explosion of that magnitude in space