3 ms·
There are still plenty of countries and significant chunk of the conservatative US which treats it like a illness, that's not the point. The discussion about 2
by manquer 6y ago
There are still plenty of countries and significant chunk of the conservatative US which treats it like a illness, that's not the point.
The discussion about 2decades seems to about accepted academic outcome not policy execution, which is always varied.
FGM or homeopathy or chinese medicine is still a problem in many parts of the world. We don't think validaty of science or anatomy depends on your country.
- est31 6y agoDefinitely, science shouldn't depend on the country, but the USA isn't the world either, and the person I was replying to equated the USA with the world. At least they should have used the year when ICD-10 came out.
- manquer 6y agoYes, you are right , there is fairly blurry line on when something becomes accepted . ICD-10 could be one unambiguous way to classify.