2 ms·
Depends on what’s written in the notes - but unless the notes specifically say otherwise, the presumption is that the patient’s recollection is the accurate one
by ghufran_syed 6y ago
Depends on what’s written in the notes - but unless the notes specifically say otherwise, the presumption is that the patient’s recollection is the accurate one, given that this is an unusual situation for the patient to be in, but a routine situation for the doctor.
The lawyer would probably need to subpoena the nurse if the notes didn’t have adequate detail to tell one way or the other. About the “pain is only experienced in the moment” - it wouldn’t be hard to find expert witnesses willing to testify that this was unacceptable medical care. But I don’t know enough about the legal aspects to know how that would translate into a claim for damages.
- srtjstjsj 6y ago> the presumption is that the patient’s recollection is the accurate one, given that this is an unusual situation for the patient to be in, but a routine situation for the doctor. That doesn't make sense to me. The patient is in a shocking situation and intoxicated. More important is that the doctor wasn't even present for the medication so has no evidence at all. Damages are decided by jury's emotions.