4 ms·
Python 3 is only unusual in its failure. Perl6 Apocalypses [1] is wonderful. Python 3000 is pointless [2]. I've been Python developer at that time, the writing
by sergeykish 6y ago
Python 3 is only unusual in its failure. Perl6 Apocalypses [1] is wonderful. Python 3000 is pointless [2].
I've been Python developer at that time, the writing was on the wall. They have not provided migration path. PEP 414 "Complaint: This PEP may harm adoption of Python 3.2" [3], this is insane. Community voted with feet — they've stayed with Python 2 until clean migration path arrived. I've switched to Ruby and been happy since.
Ruby 1.8.7 was supported for five years.
You had to write Python 2 code and run 2to3, you had to live in the past or abandon it.
[1] https://raku.org/archive/doc/apocalypse.html https://raku.org/archive/doc/apocalypse.html
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Python#Features https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Python#Features
[3] https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0414/ https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0414/