Thus paving the way for being arbitrary. Because the decision of what's fair is hidden. That's not criteria: is lack of. I understand you can't 100% define wha

Thus paving the way for being arbitrary. Because the decision of what's fair is hidden. That's not criteria: is lack of. I understand you can't 100% define what's fair. That's why judges interpret. But if Jack has to come out to state they screwed up, something's not right. And they're not fixing it, by design: decisions will still be made by highly biased Twitter personnel.