3 ms·
> because it's pretty obviously intentionally planted misinformation disguised as news "misinformation" implies it's false. What's the evidence for this? I'm
by mshroyer 6y ago
> because it's pretty obviously intentionally planted misinformation disguised as news
"misinformation" implies it's false. What's the evidence for this?
I'm as skeptical as anyone about the actual provenance of the information, but to my understanding, nobody in the Biden campaign has so far denied the material's legitimacy.
- darkerside 6y agoI think the question is, what is the information? The story seems like spaghetti, thrown at the wall to convey a sense of corruption, with no disprovable claims being made.
- mshroyer 6y agoI personally think the information is a big nothingburger. But that's quite a different thing from saying it's misinformation.
- darkerside 6y agoI think it's fair to characterize tone and intent as part of the message. And when the tone of the message is, BREAKING NEWS THERE HAS BEEN A CORRUPTION, having no evidence of it seems worthy of the phrase misinformation. As has been said about Trump so many times this cycle, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". Except nobody's saying that this time. Maybe because there is no actual claim being made? Just the appearance of one?