3 ms·
You've got this wrong. The ban on publishing personal information from hacks doesn't apply only when it's "absolutely true". It's about the claimed provenance,
by pavlov 6y ago
You've got this wrong. The ban on publishing personal information from hacks doesn't apply only when it's "absolutely true". It's about the claimed provenance, not the veracity.
If I made a tweet that reads:
"Here's some juicy extracts from jsu32's personal diary, I stole it from their hard drive"
— it would fall under Twitter's policy, regardless of whether I ever stole your hard drive or not.
- knaq 6y agoThere certainly wasn't a hack. At worst there could be a copyright issue, but political stuff is very strongly protected for fair use. The drive legitimately changed ownership, according to the repair contract, after 90 days of abandonment.
- comex 6y agoAllegedly.
- thu2111 6y agoAlmost by definition information that was stolen via hacking is true, unless for some bizarre reason the victim was privately forging documents about themselves, which nobody has ever alleged. At any rate, the OP merely observed that people supporting Twitter can't get their story straight: half are claiming it's Russian disinformation (again) and others that it's hacking (but supposedly it's not), and those two narratives aren't compatible.