4 ms·
Nuclear rockets are almost exclusively proposed for use as upper stage engines or for interplanetary transfers. One major reason for this is "no one wants their
by laverya 6y ago
Nuclear rockets are almost exclusively proposed for use as upper stage engines or for interplanetary transfers. One major reason for this is "no one wants their launch complex to glow", which is a major downside of the currently feasible nuclear rocket engines with >>1 TWR. (Orion drive, which is throwing nukes out the back and riding the shockwave, and the Nuclear Salt Water Rocket, which is like that but continuous via a standing nuclear detonation in streams of enriched Uranium salts in water)
Once you're in space, ISP matters a lot more than TWR, and is the main limiting factor on how far you can get with a given mass fraction. Nuclear rockets generally have ISPs at least double that of the current best high-thrust engines, hydrolox. (hydrogen+liquid oxygen)
- valuearb 6y agoYea but NTR’s gains in ISP is mostly wasted by all its large dead mass requirements and its requirement to use hydrogen as a fuel.
- m4rtink 6y agoIts really a shame - I've read somewhere Orion is actually even more efficient in an atmosphere! Oh well, we can still use that somewhere else where the atmosphere is not breathable or worse (Jupiter, Titan, Venus, etc.).