4 ms·
I feel like it's indeed very fault tolerant, but we're smashing nodes pretty quickly and all over the place.
by s3graham 6y ago
I feel like it's indeed very fault tolerant, but we're smashing nodes pretty quickly and all over the place.
- lpolovets 6y agoThe human race is like Netflix's Chaos Monkey but applied to the global ecosystem instead of AWS. And our configuration file is decentralized and hard to enforce.
- bryanrasmussen 6y agothere must be some science fiction series in which humans are called chaos monkeys!
- wizzwizz4 6y agoIt's not fault-tolerant in any way we'd like. It's like a computer that'll just keep on trucking; even if it's overwritten all its memory with garbage, it'll still be running some code.
- not_kurt_godel 6y ago> it'll still be running some code. This a surprisingly and pleasingly apt analogy given that DNA/RNA are indeed code being 'run' by life.
- toss1 6y agoYup, with one addition >> It'll still be running some code... until the system is degraded to the point where it crashes into either only the smallest fragments (which take tens or hundreds of millions of years to rebuild), or complete extinction
- wizzwizz4 6y agoThere's no particular reason that small fragments should rebuild. Multicellular organisms (beyond biofilms) were kind of a quirk of nature in the first place. (Not that I think all multicellular organisms are likely to die off – but if they did, why would they re-emerge?)
- toss1 6y agoIndeed! Yet, while I lack any deep understanding why they would re-emerge, paleontology seems to show a long history of mass extinctions down to very low levels, then re-emergence of more complex forms. One theory that I read of a few years back posited that life, and higher forms in particular, are more efficient at increasing entropy, i.e., diffusing heat, and so are systemically favored (seen nothing on it in a few years, so no idea of its current state; if anyone recognizes it and can provide a link, thanks in advance!).