2 ms·
Copyright should be exactly like any other contract and should be treated as a breach of contract if you infringe on it, if you signed it. If you're selling you
by jokethrowaway 6y ago
Copyright should be exactly like any other contract and should be treated as a breach of contract if you infringe on it, if you signed it.
If you're selling your work to millions of people you're probably making a decent amount of money. The difficulty of enforcing millions of contracts at the same time are nothing but a market way to tax your profits.
The less you sell, the easier it will be to pinpoint the culprit and sue him.
As a creator you're in your right to sue whoever breached your contract with them and redistributed / copied your work / didn't respect your conditions, but is it going to be cost efficient (especially if you consider the marketing side of piracy)?
Someone pirating your content without entering into a contract with you is not breaching any contract and, despite being highly immoral, is not doing anything wrong. The original copy must have been sourced from somewhere though, so I would consider it fair to put the entire cost to whoever breached the contract first.
If as a society we create regulations that allow big corporations and their friends in the government to infringe on people's freedom, we're not only losing our freedom but also increasing inequality.
- shmerl 6y agoCopyright isn't a contract though. It's a government sanctioned ability to control the use of information. It shouldn't exist in the first place, unless public gets something in return, which is progress and useful arts.