Well now, that is an interesting question! I don't know much about the historical use of "payola" that record labels would pay DJs to play their songs. It's int

Well now, that is an interesting question! I don't know much about the historical use of "payola" that record labels would pay DJs to play their songs. It's interesting that the libertarians would say "So what?" Most of us though would recognize the conflict-of-interest, just like we require people to at least tell us that certain speech is paid. Maybe that's the comprimise that would work here - Apple would keep Google as the default, but add a clear notice that they'd been paid, and how much. "Keep default search? Google paid us 12B USD for this value, are you sure?" Maybe it will get people questioning why the Goog wants search traffic so badly. And ad traffic. And DNS traffic. And video consumption traffic. And...