3 ms·
Again, nobody is blaming the victims. People hired to secure records that then do an exceedingly poor job are not the victims in this situation. Victims == pat
by fastball 6y ago
Again, nobody is blaming the victims.
People hired to secure records that then do an exceedingly poor job are not the victims in this situation. Victims == patients.
In your analogies of rape/murder, the (almost) equivalent would be if there was a doorman at an apartment building who was supposed to verify the identity of everyone entering the building, but failed to do so, letting the unauthorized perpetrator into the building and thus allowing the victim to be raped/murdered. It was literally his job to prevent such a situation, and he failed. You maintain that he has no responsibility in this matter?
- TeaDrunk 6y agoI'm just saying why assume a malicious actor is saying any truth about the circumstances of their malice?
- fastball 6y agoI agree, but the comment I was responding to was operating under the assumption that the claim was true and was making a different point than merely "don't accept things hackers say at face value". Probably because the OC had already hedged: > if true, I see two quilty parties here.
- TeaDrunk 6y agoYes, and my response is "I don't see why we need to give it any credence whatsoever enough to comment on it".
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]