3 ms·
But we did, though we used the term "algebraic effects". And while it's being actively worked on, it hasn't landed yet, so I don't know that I'd call it recent.
by yminsky 6y ago
But we did, though we used the term "algebraic effects". And while it's being actively worked on, it hasn't landed yet, so I don't know that I'd call it recent...
- theaeolist 6y agoIndeeds, sorry. I searched for "handler" and saw no hit. It's a very interesting topic for me. I wouldn't call them 'algebraic' anymore because the way they are done in OCaml the algebraic aspects are fairly obscured. It's the handling semantics which is critical. Anyway, this is besides the point.
- kyawzazaw 6y agobtw, on a tangential note, in this episode of Python, OCaml, timestamp seems to be off.