> That's the point though: you should only need one package manager. That's orthogonal to the issue. Even with just one package manager, how packages are creat

> That's the point though: you should only need one package manager. That's orthogonal to the issue. Even with just one package manager, how packages are created and maintained is a separate task. So, if the pandoc package has dependencies vendored, dependency hell is avoided regardless of which package manager is used to install it. If, however, the pandoc package has all dependencies listed as separate packages, dependency hell is created, again regardless of which package manager is used to install it. So this is a matter of policy, not tooling.